Carry an interesting reflection of Vincenzo Caico on Facebook and the world of social networks (taken from kokopelli ):
"People who are registered in Italy on Facebook are now more than three million. It is a phenomenon that probably has no precedent: if they speak on television and in newspapers, it is discussed at the bar or restaurant, but also in places where a culture or policy. I think the jump to Facebook as in Italy, as elsewhere, is due largely to its new interface: A larger, more efficient, more usable. And, in my opinion, some things could still be improved and made easier to use.
I also actively use Facebook: I like the idea of \u200b\u200bhaving to constantly reach my friends, the opportunity to engage and get involved in activities and initiatives, the chance to share their content, to launch a provocation or express an opinion and have immediate feedback.
Using Facebook as a tool to do things that have an impact in the reality of all day and do not consider him, as they could always lodge a number of generators of those calls tecnocazzate Luca Conti, a sort of parallel universe or, worse yet, a virtual place to shelter oneself from the reality.
Those who were short of the posts published on my blog, the notes are now posted on Facebook: reach in this way, more immediately, a much wider and varied readership. Also - and I do not like Catherine - I confess that my status on Facebook has almost completely replaced the use of Twitter I did.
Probably, however, the basis of the merits of Facebook are his own faults, and its main flaw is that it is a system closed that, unlike many other web services like Flickr or YouTube - just to mention the two perhaps most famous - not open on the outside, does not provide their content through the channel could be very simple like the feed: up Facebook can share what is outside, but you can not share out what is on Facebook. Everything is consumed internally, including applications.
Many probably use it because it gives them the feeling of a protected reserve within which you can move and do things without necessarily having to deal with the complex and ongoing innovations of the web: find what you're on Facebook enough to communicate with your friends, without committing too much. Perhaps only lacks the ability to do video conferencing, book flights and make purchases on eBay.
Massimo Mantellini writes: "My prediction is that Facebook avventanta resize a lot in the coming months. Today, its limit is a value to someone who intercepts the complexity of the Internet and want an area known for its reports. But apart from the noisy Internet in a closed environment which is preferred to the Internet, in my mind is meant to be passed tomorrow. Or so I hope at least intimately. "
I doubt that is the same in all the thoughts of others who implemented using Facebook. Maybe it's a bit 'too early to make predictions: there will come a new web service, perhaps as it should be open, which will supplant Facebook? Facebook will open doors? Facebook will continue to be a protected reserve but will use in an ever wider and more intelligent what lies outside it? There was a time, and perhaps still is, that for many people "go online" meant to click on Internet Explorer. At some point in the web which many identify with Facebook? "
"People who are registered in Italy on Facebook are now more than three million. It is a phenomenon that probably has no precedent: if they speak on television and in newspapers, it is discussed at the bar or restaurant, but also in places where a culture or policy. I think the jump to Facebook as in Italy, as elsewhere, is due largely to its new interface: A larger, more efficient, more usable. And, in my opinion, some things could still be improved and made easier to use.
I also actively use Facebook: I like the idea of \u200b\u200bhaving to constantly reach my friends, the opportunity to engage and get involved in activities and initiatives, the chance to share their content, to launch a provocation or express an opinion and have immediate feedback.
Using Facebook as a tool to do things that have an impact in the reality of all day and do not consider him, as they could always lodge a number of generators of those calls tecnocazzate Luca Conti, a sort of parallel universe or, worse yet, a virtual place to shelter oneself from the reality.
Those who were short of the posts published on my blog, the notes are now posted on Facebook: reach in this way, more immediately, a much wider and varied readership. Also - and I do not like Catherine - I confess that my status on Facebook has almost completely replaced the use of Twitter I did.
Probably, however, the basis of the merits of Facebook are his own faults, and its main flaw is that it is a system closed that, unlike many other web services like Flickr or YouTube - just to mention the two perhaps most famous - not open on the outside, does not provide their content through the channel could be very simple like the feed: up Facebook can share what is outside, but you can not share out what is on Facebook. Everything is consumed internally, including applications.
Many probably use it because it gives them the feeling of a protected reserve within which you can move and do things without necessarily having to deal with the complex and ongoing innovations of the web: find what you're on Facebook enough to communicate with your friends, without committing too much. Perhaps only lacks the ability to do video conferencing, book flights and make purchases on eBay.
Massimo Mantellini writes: "My prediction is that Facebook avventanta resize a lot in the coming months. Today, its limit is a value to someone who intercepts the complexity of the Internet and want an area known for its reports. But apart from the noisy Internet in a closed environment which is preferred to the Internet, in my mind is meant to be passed tomorrow. Or so I hope at least intimately. "
I doubt that is the same in all the thoughts of others who implemented using Facebook. Maybe it's a bit 'too early to make predictions: there will come a new web service, perhaps as it should be open, which will supplant Facebook? Facebook will open doors? Facebook will continue to be a protected reserve but will use in an ever wider and more intelligent what lies outside it? There was a time, and perhaps still is, that for many people "go online" meant to click on Internet Explorer. At some point in the web which many identify with Facebook? "
Vincenzo Caico
0 comments:
Post a Comment